back to Employment Law Blog

Can you get Unemployment Benefits if You Quit Your Job? It Depends…

August 30, 2024

What Illinois Office Workers Need to Know When Resigning

Are you an office worker who recently resigned from your job and was denied unemployment benefits?

You’re not alone. Many Illinois workers find themselves in this situation, unsure of their rights and options.

Before you quit your job, consider the impact your resignation would have on your ability to collect unemployment insurance benefits, which don’t replace your income, but can be a lifeline to staying financially afloat while looking for new work.

This post will explore the complexities of voluntary leave cases and how they impact unemployment benefit eligibility.

The relevant Illinois law is 820 ILCS 405/601.

Understanding Voluntary Leave in Illinois

In Illinois, employees who voluntarily leave their jobs are generally not eligible for unemployment benefits unless they can prove they had “good cause” for leaving that was attributable to the employer.

However, there are exceptions and nuances to this rule that every worker should understand. In Illinois, unemployment insurance benefits are administered by an agency called “IDES”.

10 Sample Job Resignation Unemployment Benefits Appeal Cases in Illinois

Let’s look at some real-world examples to better understand how voluntary leave cases are handled:

  1. 1. Health Concerns (ABR-83-11574/10-18-83): An employee left work citing health issues. The IDES Board of Review found that to establish good cause based on health reasons, the claimant must: (1) offer competent testimony, including medical evidence, that adequate health reasons existed to justify termination; (2) have informed the employer of the health problem; and (3) be available, where a reasonable accommodation is made by the employer, for work which is not inimical to their health. In this case, the claimant was disqualified for benefits as they failed to provide medical evidence or report unsafe conditions to the employer.

  1. 2. Sexual Harassment (85-BRD-05589/7-25-85): A secretary quit after enduring sexual harassment from the company owner for several months. She had expressed displeasure and rebuffed advances before finally demanding the harassment stop. When it continued, she resigned. The Board found her eligible for benefits under Section 601B-4 of the Act, which provides an exemption when an individual separates solely due to sexual harassment and the employer knew but failed to take appropriate action.

  1. 3. Ethical Concerns (ABR-85-6665/2-28-86): An Acting Director of Finance resigned rather than comply with the Executive Director’s instructions to alter financial records illegally. After investigating and confirming the illegality of the requested actions, the claimant chose to resign rather than face potential criminal charges or loss of her CPA license. The Board found this to be good cause attributable to the employer.

  1. 4. Job Dissatisfaction (83-BRD-12659/11-9-83): A sales representative quit after a two-month trial period when told she needed to put in more concentrated time. The employer offered additional training, but the claimant was unwilling to put in extra time or take the training. The IDES Board found that by refusing the opportunity for training, the claimant did not demonstrate a genuine interest in remaining employed and was disqualified for benefits.

  1. 5. Prospect of Other Work (ABR-85-1566/6-20-85): A Machine Operator and Laborer announced he would be relocating to Texas for a higher-paying job. He forewent a leave of absence, withdrew his retirement money, and moved. When the new job didn’t materialize, he attempted to return to his former employer. The Board found this to be a voluntary leaving without good cause attributable to the employer.
  2. 6. Religious Beliefs (ABR-85-8861/5-28-86): An employee quit due to a temporary schedule change that conflicted with religious beliefs. The Board found him disqualified because at the time his notice period ended, he would have returned to his original schedule that didn’t conflict with his beliefs. The Board emphasized that to avoid disqualification based on religious convictions, there must be a true religious conviction present.

  1. 7. Early Retirement Package (ABR-86-9166/7-15-87): An Assistant Mine Manager accepted an early retirement package due to fears of demotion. The Board found him eligible for benefits, considering the separation equivalent to a layoff. The employer had decided to reduce its workforce, and those who didn’t accept the package faced potential layoffs or demotions. The Board viewed this as involuntary unemployment due to economic conditions beyond the claimant’s control.

  1. 8. Reduction in Hours (ABR-20-16071/11-5-20): A dietary supervisor resigned after 23 years of employment when the COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in her duties and restrictions on wearing personal protective equipment. The Board found that the employer created a substantially less favorable work situation by requiring increased interaction with residents without allowing use of PPE when COVID-19 protocols should have been in place. The claimant’s attempts to resolve the issue were unsuccessful, and she left to protect her health and safety. The Board held this was good cause attributable to the employer.

  1. 9. Workplace Stress (Childress v. Department of Employment Security, 2021 IL App (1st) 191993): An employee resigned citing stress, overwork, and feeling “pushed out.” The Board found the claimant ineligible for benefits, concluding that she was not subjected to conditions that would have rendered the job unsuitable. The court affirmed, noting that workplace stress typically doesn’t constitute good cause absent medical documentation submitted to the employer and not accommodated.

  1. 10. Change in Working Conditions (Davis v. Board of Review, 465 N.E. 2d 576 (Ill. App. 1 Dist. 1984)): A School Child Development Coordinator resigned after being required to incorporate emotionally disturbed teenagers into her program and teach them in addition to her administrative duties. The court affirmed the principle that an individual should make reasonable efforts to resolve conflicts before voluntarily terminating employment. In this case, the claimant made “numerous and substantial attempts” to resolve the situation with her superiors before resigning, which was considered good cause attributable to the employer.

Key Takeaways for Office Workers

Certify for Benefits Even if You’ve Been Denied: Even if you’ve been denied benefits, continue to certify with IDES as scheduled. This can be crucial if you appeal the decision as continuing to certify for benefits would allow you to collect back unemployment benefits if you are later deemed eligible to collect benefits.

Remember, each case is unique, and the outcome depends on the specific circumstances. If you’re considering resigning from your job, it’s wise to understand how it might affect your eligibility for unemployment benefits before making your decision.

By staying informed and prepared, office workers can better navigate the complexities of unemployment benefits in Illinois, especially in cases of voluntary leave.

See the full statute on IDES Voluntary Leaving below:

(820 ILCS 405/601) (from Ch. 48, par. 431)
Sec. 601. Voluntary leaving.
A. An individual shall be ineligible for benefits for the week in which he or she has left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the employing unit and, thereafter, until he or she has become reemployed and has had earnings equal to or in excess of his or her current weekly benefit amount in each of four calendar weeks which are either for services in employment, or have been or will be reported pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act by each employing unit for which such services are performed and which submits a statement certifying to that fact.
B. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to an individual who has left work voluntarily:
1. Because he or she is deemed physically unable to
    perform his or her work by a licensed and practicing physician, or because the individual's assistance is necessary for the purpose of caring for his or her spouse, child, or parent who, according to a licensed and practicing physician or as otherwise reasonably verified, is in poor physical or mental health or is a person with a mental or physical disability and the employer is unable to accommodate the individual's need to provide such assistance;
2. To accept other bona fide work and, after such
    acceptance, the individual is either not unemployed in each of 2 weeks, or earns remuneration for such work equal to at least twice his or her current weekly benefit amount;
3. In lieu of accepting a transfer to other work
    offered to the individual by the employing unit under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement or pursuant to an established employer plan, program, or policy, if the acceptance of such other work by the individual would require the separation from that work of another individual currently performing it;
4. Solely because of the sexual harassment of the
    individual by another employee. Sexual harassment means (1) unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical contact or other conduct or communication which is made a term or condition of the employment or (2) the employee's submission to or rejection of such conduct or communication which is the basis for decisions affecting employment, or (3) when such conduct or communication has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment and the employer knows or should know of the existence of the harassment and fails to take timely and appropriate action;
5. Which he or she had accepted after separation from
    other work, and the work which he or she left voluntarily would be deemed unsuitable under the provisions of Section 603;
6.(a) Because the individual left work due to
    verified domestic violence as defined in Section 103 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 where the domestic violence caused the individual to reasonably believe that his or her continued employment would jeopardize his or her safety or the safety of his or her spouse, minor child, or parent
if the individual provides the following:
(i) notice to the employing unit of the reason
        for the individual's voluntarily leaving; and
(ii) to the Department provides:
(A) an order of protection or other
            documentation of equitable relief issued by a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(B) a police report or criminal charges
            documenting the domestic violence; or
(C) medical documentation of the domestic
            violence; or
(D) evidence of domestic violence from a
            member of the clergy, attorney, counselor, social worker, health worker or domestic violence shelter worker.
(b) If the individual does not meet the provisions of
    subparagraph (a), the individual shall be held to have voluntarily terminated employment for the purpose of determining the individual's eligibility for benefits pursuant to subsection A.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision to the
    contrary, evidence of domestic violence experienced by an individual, or his or her spouse, minor child, or parent, including the individual's statement and corroborating evidence, shall not be disclosed by the Department unless consent for disclosure is given by the individual.
7. Because, due to a change in location of employment
    of the individual's spouse, the individual left work to accompany his or her spouse to a place from which it is impractical to commute or because the individual left employment to accompany a spouse who has been reassigned from one military assignment to another. The employer's account, however, shall not be charged for any benefits paid out to the individual who leaves work under a circumstance described in this paragraph.
C. Within 90 days of the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 96th General Assembly, the Department shall promulgate rules, pursuant to the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act and consistent with Section 903(f)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act, to clarify and provide guidance regarding eligibility and the prevention of fraud.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.)

© 2023 Pietrucha Law Firm, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

(630) 344-6370    info@pietruchalaw.com  

1717 N Naper Blvd Suite 200, Naperville, IL 60563